Troika Performance Intelligence

Science that turns
physiology into
race outcomes

A complete physiological profiling and race intelligence platform built for NCAA programs that demand measurable competitive advantage.

Paris 2024 Olympics — 23 athletes, 5 medallists
35+ years international elite coaching science
Active partnerships: Tennessee · ASU · Amherst · South Africa · Malaysia
Published: Glucose Turn Point · 2CA Tri-Phasic Metabolic Model
  SWIMMER PHYSIOLOGICAL PROFILER v10.5
Athlete Profile — 200m Freestyle ACTIVE
WERP — Weighted Event Reference Point
76% of ceiling
1.78 m·s⁻¹
Δ +0.04 vs last block
4.82
CS (m·s⁻¹)
18.4 kJ
W′ Prime
847
Swift Score
Froude-Adaptive Power–Velocity Curve (P ∝ v³)
WERP CS
Training Zone Distribution
Z1
Base
Z2
Aerobic
Z3
Tempo
Z4
Threshold
Z5
VO₂max
Z6
Anaerobic
35+
Years elite international coaching science
5
Olympic medallists Paris 2024
3
US university active partnerships
v10.5
Current profiler — iteratively field-validated
The Platform Suite

Three precision instruments.
One integrated intelligence.

TPI is not a generic sports science platform. Every algorithm is derived from peer-reviewed published research by Emma Swanwick — the Glucose Turn Point, the 2CA tri-phasic metabolic model, and the Froude-adaptive power law unique to aquatic environments.

🏊
Swimmer Physiological Profiler
v10.5 — Core Engine
Derives an individually-specific physiological ceiling from multi-event lactate and speed data, replacing population-based norms with athlete-precise intensity anchors.
WERP — Weighted Event Reference Point ceiling velocity
W′ (Work Prime) anaerobic energy reserve quantification
Froude-corrected P ∝ v³ power-velocity curve (novel, publication-ready)
Swift Swim compound performance score
Individually-scaled 6-zone training prescription
📊
Race Intelligence Report
2CA Metabolic Analysis
Partitions every race into its three metabolic contributions — aerobic oxidative, aerobic-glycolytic, and anaerobic — using simultaneously measured lactate and glucose, not estimates.
Split-by-split pacing analysis vs WERP ceiling
W′BAL depletion curve through the race
Post-race actionable prescription: what to change and why
Side-by-side multi-race progression tracking
Exportable PDF / coaching dashboard formats
📡
FuelEdge CGM Platform
Apex Glucose Intelligence
Real-time continuous glucose monitoring via Abbott Libre Sense, validated against the 2CA framework to give training load and metabolic shift data never previously available at pool level.
Real-time glucose-based training load scoring
VLamax analogue from glucose kinetics
Glucose Turn Point (Gt) — published threshold marker
Critical Speed integration from Profiler
Reynolds / Froude hydrodynamic overlays
🟢 Live now — Open FuelEdge Dashboard ↗
🚣
Rowing Physiological Profiler
v1.0 — Cross-Sport Engine
The same Froude-adaptive framework ported to ergometer and on-water rowing. One science base, multiple sport applications — ideal for multi-sport athletic departments seeking unified physiological intelligence.
📈
SwimTracker Programme Manager
Season Planning Intelligence
Macro-to-micro training load management aligned to the Base Six developmental framework — from year-round periodisation through to the 10-4 micro-cycle. Bridges physiological data with coaching decisions.
Race Intelligence Report
200m Freestyle — Conference Championships
Final Time
1:43.82
Split Pacing vs WERP Ceiling
50m
92% WERP
24.61
100m
88% WERP
26.14
150m
81% WERP
27.03
200m
76% WERP
26.04
2CA Metabolic Partition
54%
Aerobic Oxidative
28%
Aerobic Glycolytic
18%
Anaerobic
W′BAL Depletion Through Race
W′ Full −83%
Key coaching insight: 150m split indicates W′ depletion beginning at ~120m. Third-50 aerobic glycolytic surge is masking a trainable anaerobic efficiency gap. Recommend 3×150 at 88–90% WERP with W′ partial recovery intervals.
Race Intelligence Output

Every race tells a metabolic story. We translate it into next training's prescription.

No other platform combines split-by-split WERP-anchored pacing analysis with real metabolic partition data. Coaches stop guessing about why a third 50 fell apart. The answer is in the data.

1

WERP-relative split analysis

Every split is expressed as a percentage of the athlete's individually-derived physiological ceiling — not population norms. The coach sees exactly where pacing strategy diverged from optimal energy allocation.

2

2CA metabolic partition

Simultaneously measured lactate and glucose data partition the entire race into aerobic oxidative, aerobic-glycolytic, and anaerobic contributions. Published methodology. No estimates.

3

W′BAL race simulation

Shows exactly when anaerobic energy reserve was depleted through the race. Makes the invisible mechanism behind fade-outs and negative split failures completely visible.

4

Prescriptive coaching output

The system doesn't just describe — it prescribes. Each report ends with a specific training recommendation derived from the metabolic gap identified, referenced back to the athlete's own profiler data.

The Science Underneath

Built on published research. Validated on Olympic athletes.

The TPI platform is not a software product sitting on top of someone else's sports science. Every algorithm traces directly to peer-reviewed publications by the founding researcher.

Glucose Turn Point (Gt)
A non-invasive, glucose-derived exercise intensity threshold, published by Swanwick & Matthews (2017). Forms the foundation of the FuelEdge CGM platform and provides a population-agnostic intensity anchor validated across elite and recreational populations.
2CA Tri-Phasic Metabolic Model
Simultaneous lactate-glucose measurement to partition aerobic and anaerobic contributions (Swanwick, Pyne & Matthews, 2018). Underpins the Race Report's metabolic breakdown — the only model that uses actual biomarkers rather than VO₂ proxies for metabolic partition in the field.
Froude-Adaptive Power Law (novel)
A water-physics power-velocity framework applying iterative Froude wave-drag correction (P ∝ v³), replacing land-based CP models in aquatic settings. Critical speed-constrained exponent. Earmarked for academic publication — first field-deployable model of its kind.
FuelEdge — CGM Training Dashboard
LIVE SESSION
Glucose mg·dL⁻¹ — Session Trace with Gt Threshold
Gt threshold 0 min 60 min 140 110 80
128
mg·dL⁻¹
+8.4
Δ since CS
Z3
Zone
Glucose-Based Training Load (GTL) Score
64 / 100 — Moderate-High
VLamax indicator: Glucose excursion above Gt at 34 min suggests aerobic-glycolytic shift — athlete approaching lactate accumulation threshold. Recommend set reduction in next 15 min.
Athlete Positioning & Anaerobic Capacity

The two visuals that make coaches put down their phone.

The Triangle Profile and W′ panel are consistently the moments in a demo where coaches stop multi-tasking. One shows where an athlete sits in the entire energy system landscape. The other quantifies the anaerobic reserve they're actually racing on.

Energy System Triangle Profile
Event Zone Clouds — Squad Positioning
Athlete
Event zone
75% 50% 25% 50m 100m 200m 400m 800m 1500m AEROBIC OXIDATIVE ANAEROBIC Ae.GLYCOLYTIC Aerobic % AeG % An %
50m
100m
200m
400m
800m
1500m
Athlete position
What the coach sees instantly
The event zone clouds show where athletes in each event should cluster based on their metabolic demands. The athlete's dot shows where this swimmer actually sits. When a 200m freestyler's dot is drifting into the 400m zone, the training conversation writes itself — they're aerobically over-developed relative to their event ceiling, and their anaerobic contribution is undertrained. No explanation required. One glance.
W′ Critical Capacity Panel
Anaerobic Work Reserve — Froude-Derived D′
W′ Anaerobic Reserve
18.4
kJ
W′ per kg Body Mass
245
J·kg⁻¹
8.7
D′ (m)
Froude-derived
34.2
W′ Duration (s)
Above CS
1.78
CS (m·s⁻¹)
Critical speed
W′BAL Depletion — Race Simulation by Event
100% 50% 0% W′BAL 50m 100m 200m ← 400m Start 50% Finish Race Duration (normalised)
Coaching read: This athlete's W′ of 18.4 kJ supports 34s above critical speed before depletion. Their 200m race is consuming ~82% of W′ — leaving meaningful reserve. Prescription: increase intensity of the race's third 50 to target 90–92% W′ utilisation.
How D′ is derived — what makes this unique
D′ is computed directly from the Froude-corrected P ∝ v³ power-velocity curve — not from a straight-line distance-time regression. The mean of (v_i − v_WERP) × t_i across all curve points above critical speed, consistent with the same water-physics model driving every other output. No land-based approximations. No standard CP model shortcuts. The anaerobic reserve is derived in the same physical framework as the critical speed itself.
Why W′ changes what you prescribe
Every coach knows their swimmer is "fading." W′ tells you whether that fade is W′ depletion (fix: more anaerobic capacity work, longer recovery intervals) or premature depletion through poor pacing (fix: hold 88% WERP longer before the third 50 push). Two very different problems. W′ tells you which one you're actually dealing with.
Ready to see it live?

Start with a 30-minute demo.
See your athletes' data differently.

TPI is already operating at Tennessee, Arizona State, and Amherst College. Partner programmes receive full platform access, on-site testing protocol support, and co-authorship on emerging publications.

Emma Swanwick M.Med.Sci · PhD Candidate (Exercise Physiology) · Troika Performance Intelligence
emma@troikaperformance.com  ·  troikaperformance.com